结论 - 三星Galaxy A17 5GGalaxy A17 5G 与前代产品Galaxy A16 5G 相比，更新幅度相对较小。尽管如此，它仍然是一款经济实惠、功能齐全的智能手机，非常适合日常使用。
三星立即限制了其六年更新一次的承诺，使其不再是一个承诺，而更像是一个目标，这有点令人讨厌。这样做也许有很好的理由，比如与未来Android 版本的驱动程序兼容性方面的不确定性，但它仍然给人留下了苦涩的回味。
坚固的机身给我们留下了深刻的印象，甚至还有大猩猩玻璃保护屏幕。三星还对重量和尺寸进行了一些调整，使手机比以前更加小巧。
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
为什么采用 Exynos SoC 的设备的电池续航时间总是比竞争对手的短，这是三星应该最终解开的一个谜。Galaxy A17 5G 的电池续航时间也比许多同类手机差。
对于日常使用来说，其性能是可以接受的，制造商也对功耗进行了一些优化。我们喜欢精确的定位和不错的扬声器音效。非常明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕也是该价位手机的一大卖点。
总的来说，Galaxy A17 5G 值得推荐。不过，您不应该过分依赖更新承诺。
Pros+ 安全更新至 2031 年
+ 明亮的 90 Hz AMOLED
+ 大猩猩胜利玻璃
+ 可靠的指纹传感器
+ 精确的 GPS
+ 灵活的相机系统
+ 实惠的价格
+ 坚固的外壳
+ 不错的扬声器音效Cons- 只有 4GB 内存
- 性能有限
- 电池续航能力一般
- 不稳定的更新承诺
- 不支持 eSIM 卡
- PWM 闪烁
价格和供应情况这款手机已在许多零售商处有售，起价不到 230 美元。
这与亚马逊网站入门级（128GB 版本）智能手机的价格差不多。
AmazonSamsung Galaxy A17 5G Ai (256GB + 8GB) Unlocked (Compatible with T-Mobile Mint Tello & Global) SM-A176B/DS Dual SIM / 6.7" 50MP Triple (Black SM-A176BZKQGTO)
Table of Contents结论 - 三星Galaxy A17 5G规格外壳 - 采用大猩猩玻璃，坚固耐用功能 - 最好能有更多内存软件 - 更新承诺听起来不错通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 5G 和速度一般的 Wi-Fi电话功能和语音质量 -Galaxy 电话让我们的声音被听到相机 - 物美价廉的镜头配件和保修 - 2 年放心保修输入设备和操作 - 便捷的显示屏和得体的生物识别技术显示屏 - AMOLED 是Galaxy 手机的一大亮点性能--新功能不多游戏 - 小规模游戏排放 - 保持凉爽，几乎不节流电池续航时间 - 可以做得更好 Notebookcheck 总体评分可能的替代品比较
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
从销售数据来看，很多人都拥有三星 A 系列智能手机。Galaxy A17 5G 可能又会特别受欢迎，因为它的价格也非常实惠：它采用了目前最快的移动网络标准，而且制造商承诺长期更新。
再加上简洁而合理的高品质外观，它一定会成为一款畅销产品，不是吗？那么，关于这款入门级手机的讨论点有很多，让我们开始详细分析吧。
规格
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Galaxy A10 Series)ProcessorSamsung Exynos 1330 8c/8t, 2 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78, 6 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, ARM Cortex-A55 / A78Graphics adapterARM Mali-G68 MP2Memory4 GB Display6.70 inch 20:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 385 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, 90 HzStorage128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB , 100 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 2TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compassNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n3/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 7.5 x 164.4 x 77.9Battery5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25 Watt chargingChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 15CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/30fps (Camera 1); 5.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0Additional featuresSpeakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.665W/kg Head, 0.972W/kg Body; IP54-certified, fanlessWeight192 g
Price209 EuroAmazonLinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
外壳 - 采用大猩猩玻璃，坚固耐用Galaxy A17 5G 以圆角和磨砂背面呈现在买家面前。与上一代产品Galaxy A16 5G 不同的是，该机背面的相机镜头现在共用一个边框。
机身比前代产品略薄，重量也轻了几克。磨砂背面很容易留下指纹，在我们的深灰色机型上尤其明显。另外还有浅灰色和中蓝色可供选择。
外壳与去年相同，具有 IP54 防水防尘等级。这样就能很好地防止异物进入，但不要将手机浸入液体中。
机身非常稳定，没有任何吱吱作响或弯曲。总的来说，这款手机显得非常小巧耐用。与前代产品类似，该机正面安装了非常坚固的大猩猩 Victus 玻璃来保护屏幕。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
笔记本电脑Galaxy A17 5G 评测
尺寸比较
Xiaomi Redmi 14C Motorola Moto G15 Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Samsung Galaxy A17 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G DIN A6 ❌
功能 - 最好能有更多内存三星为其入门级手机配备了微不足道的 4GB 内存。存储容量采用 UFS 2.2 闪存，有 128GB 和 256GB 两种规格。价格相差约 30 美元。
遗憾的是，自去年的机型以来，耳机插孔已被取消。音频输出通过 USB-C 端口处理，该端口内部按照 USB 2.0 标准连接，因此只能进行相对较慢的数据传输。此外还有一个 NFC 接口，可支持非接触式支付。
目前仍不支持 eSIM 卡，但最多可支持两个 nano-SIM 卡。
首页: 麦克风
底部麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
右侧待机键、音量摇杆
左：SIM 卡插槽microSD 读卡器您也可以只插入一张 SIM 卡，另一个插槽则用于通过 microSD 卡扩展存储。实际上，三星在这里安装了一个速度相当快的读卡器，在我们使用参考 microSD 卡 Angelbird V60 进行的测试中就可以看到这一点。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
56.42 MB/s +1%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330 (Angelbird V60)
55.9 MB/s Xiaomi Redmi 14CMediatek Helio G81 Ultra (Angelbird V60)
32.6 MB/s -42%Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=53, last 2 years)
32.6 MB/s -42%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
30.1 MB/s -46%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81 (Angelbird V60)
29.8 MB/s -47%
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø43.9 (28.8-61.7) MB/sSamsung Galaxy A17 5G; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.4 (20.7-105) MB/s
软件 - 更新承诺听起来不错Android 15 是三星 OneUI 的基础，它极大地改变了操作系统，除了标准的谷歌应用程序外，还带来了许多系统应用程序，如照片库。安全补丁是从 2025 年 9 月开始的，因此在我们查看时是最新的。
三星承诺，这款经济型智能手机的安全更新将持续到 2031 年，而且将每季度发布一次。此外，还计划进行六次操作系统更新，使其达到Android 21。
不过，三星加上了后缀 "直至"，使整个承诺有了明确的意义。细则中还写道"上述操作系统和安全更新政策可能会有变动"。
可持续性三星Galaxy A17 5G 的二氧化碳排放量数据不详。三星只报告了 1.2% 的可回收材料份额，而该手机只有 12.2% 的材料可回收。
三星Galaxy A17 5G 尚未出现在任何三星自修数据库中。因为这款手机还很新。
包装完全由纸张制成。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 5G 和速度一般的 Wi-FiWi-Fi 5 再次成为最快的 Wi-Fi 标准，但遗憾的是，其数据传输速度与上一款智能手机的表现不尽相同。特别是在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 路由器进行的测试中，我们发现速度明显下降，有时甚至低于 200 Mbps。这样的速度对于日常浏览来说还是足够稳定的，但如果有人想利用它的千兆性能，那就得另寻他处了。
本次评测涵盖的是Galaxy A17 的 5G 版本，但这款智能手机还配备了 4G 调制解调器和不同的 SoC。我们将很快对该机型进行评测。我们目前的评测设备有足够的 4G 和 5G 频段供在国外使用，但Galaxy A17 5G 并不是一款全球通用的手机。
与高端手机相比，接收能力通常较弱，尤其是在狭窄的小巷等恶劣环境中。
NetworkingSamsung Galaxy A17 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000
305 (min: 213) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
243 (min: 170) MBit/s ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000
304 (min: 293) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
349 (min: 346) MBit/s ∼48%
Motorola Moto G15802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000
293 (min: 262) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
358 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000
272 (min: 221) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
369 (min: 342) MBit/s ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000
373 (min: 183) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
351 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼49%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000
337 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼46%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
721 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø305 (213-342) MBit/sSamsung Galaxy A17 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø243 (170-286) MBit/s
GPS 室外测试
可用的卫星网络在室外，追踪系统对我们的定位精度可达 3 米，但偶尔也需要一些时间。
我们的实际定位跟踪测试是在骑自行车时进行的，当时我们还佩戴了非常精确的 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表。
在这项测试中，三星Galaxy A17 5G 的表现几乎堪称典范。除了路线上的一些小偏差外，一切都跟踪得非常准确。
这意味着我们可以推荐这款经济实惠的三星智能手机作为导航系统的替代品。
三星Galaxy A17 位置 - 概览
三星Galaxy A17 位置 - 转折点
SamsungGalaxy A17 location - Bridge
Garmin Venu 2 位置 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 的位置 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 的位置 - 桥接电话功能和语音质量 -Galaxy 电话让我们的声音被听到只要你的手机供应商支持，你就可以在三星手机应用中启用 Wi-Fi 通话。VoLTE 可以在连接设置中找到。
为了测试Galaxy A17 5G 的语音质量，我们拨打了几次电话，发现我们的声音传输得相当清晰，而对方的声音听起来却有点闷。当我们激活免提麦克风和扬声器时，我们的声音仍然很容易被对方听懂，尽管通话者注意到有轻微的回声。
相机 - 物美价廉的镜头前置摄像头图像与 A16 5G 相比，三星并没有改变摄像头的设置。 Galaxy A16 5G或 Galaxy A15 5G.但这并不是绝对必要的，因为售价不到 230 美元的Galaxy A17 依然配备了 5000 万像素的主镜头，在光线充足的环境下也能拍出不错的照片。
当然，就细节和动态范围而言，A17 的图像还无法与高端智能手机的摄像头相媲美。但色彩还原和清晰度却令人印象深刻。
视频最高可录制 1080p 和 30fps。自动对焦有时有些迟缓，但总体而言，图像质量还是不错的。
为了增加灵活性，还配备了 500 万像素超广角镜头和 200 万像素微距摄像头。不要指望这两个镜头能拍出极致的细节，因为它们的分辨率太低了。不同焦距之间也不能连续变焦，这意味着你只能手动切换。
前置摄像头的分辨率为 1300 万像素，自拍效果相当不错，不过细节可能有些模糊。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera environmentMain camera low lightWide-angle cameraclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A17 5GApple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A17 5GApple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A17 5GApple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A17 5GApple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
乍看之下，在摄影棚的充足灯光下，主相机上的测试图表显得相当干净。细看之下，在棕色背景的衬托下，文字的边缘变得模糊不清。图像边缘的清晰度有所下降。
在 1 勒克斯条件下，主体仍然清晰可辨，但非常模糊。
13.1 ∆E14.1 ∆E14.4 ∆E10.1 ∆E14.1 ∆E5.2 ∆E11.3 ∆E12.4 ∆E15.3 ∆E3.7 ∆E8.6 ∆E7.1 ∆E5.4 ∆E11.9 ∆E14 ∆E6.1 ∆E8.2 ∆E8 ∆E3.2 ∆E4.1 ∆E13.2 ∆E13.6 ∆E4.9 ∆E4.6 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A17 5G: 9.44 ∆E min: 3.18 - max: 15.35 ∆E22.6 ∆E35.8 ∆E27.2 ∆E24.5 ∆E29.5 ∆E42.9 ∆E35.2 ∆E22.6 ∆E26 ∆E21 ∆E39 ∆E44.6 ∆E19.7 ∆E29.8 ∆E21 ∆E39.2 ∆E29.4 ∆E31 ∆E40.3 ∆E38.1 ∆E37.8 ∆E29 ∆E21.1 ∆E13 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A17 5G: 30.01 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 44.6 ∆E
Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Galaxy A17 5G
配件和保修 - 2 年放心保修包装盒里除了手机外，只有一条 USB-C 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。
三星提供 24 个月的 保修期保修。
输入设备和操作 - 便捷的显示屏和得体的生物识别技术Galaxy A17 5G 的 90 Hz 显示屏是一个真正的亮点，是流畅操作的保证。
音量摇杆和电源键位于机身右侧。用手指很容易就能找到它们，部分原因是三星在这里略微抬高了机壳。
电源键内部集成了指纹传感器，配对后可以可靠地识别指纹。即使在屏幕关闭的情况下，也能快速解锁智能手机。
您还可以使用前置摄像头和 2D 面部识别进行登录，屏幕在弱光环境下也能提供足够的照明。
键盘肖像
键盘景观显示屏 - AMOLED 是Galaxy 手机的一大亮点子像素图像与众不同的是，三星为其经济实惠的入门级智能手机配备了 AMOLED 显示屏。2340 x 1080 像素的高分辨率也令人印象深刻，使 6.7 英寸显示屏能够清晰地显示内容。像素密度为 385 PPI。
可达到的亮度水平也令人印象深刻，最高可达 691 cd/m²，在屏幕亮度较低的情况下甚至可达到 1144 cd/m²。这在同价位产品中是相当不错的成绩。
我们测得低亮度时的 PWM 频率为 120 Hz。该频率根据帧频进行调整，因此对敏感用户的影响较小。不过，如果您知道可能会有问题，我们建议您先测试显示屏，然后再花钱购买。
699cd/m²683cd/m²662cd/m²643cd/m²691cd/m²674cd/m²682cd/m²655cd/m²663cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 699 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 672.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %Center on Battery: 691 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.15 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.041CCT: 6507 K
Samsung Galaxy A17 5GAMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSuper AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"Motorola Moto G15IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"Xiaomi Redmi 14CIPS, 1640x720, 6.9"Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GAMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"Screen15%-1%-18%40%Brightness middle (cd/m²)691739 7%468 -32%422 -39%1147 66%Brightness (cd/m²)672741 10%452 -33%401 -40%1146 71%Brightness Distribution (%)9297 5%86 -7%89 -3%96 4%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.30.3Colorchecker dE 2000 *3.152.6 17%2.07 34%3.21 -2%1.6 49%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *4.413.8 14%6.38 -45%6.29 -43%3.7 16%Greyscale dE 2000 *3.62.2 39%0.8 78%2.9 19%2.3 36%Gamma2.041 108%2.04 108%2.202 100%2.382 92%2.27 97%CCT6507 100%6327 103%6607 98%6338 103%6368 102%Contrast (:1)15601407* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 HzAmplitude: 14 %The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
最低亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度以固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。
使用 "自然 "色彩配置文件，Galaxy A17 5G 显示的色彩略微明亮，但没有色差。总体而言，色彩和灰度显示相当准确，肉眼几乎看不出差别。
卡尔曼灰阶
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise↘ 17.9 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey3.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.8 ms rise↘ 1.9 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms).
AMOLED 的高亮度使智能手机即使在明亮的环境中也能提供高可读性。
即使视角很窄，色彩和亮度也不会失真。
室外使用
视角稳定性性能--新功能不多与前代产品一样，Galaxy A17 5G 也采用了 Exynos 1330系统芯片。这次的基准测试结果略高，但这可能是软件优化的结果。
总的来说，对于这个价位的入门级手机来说，评测设备的运行速度很快，但在使用要求更高的应用程序时很快就会遇到问题。即使在日常使用中，浏览菜单或执行简单动画时也会偶尔出现卡顿。
人工智能计算的处理能力也相对有限。
Geekbench 6.7 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.7
Single-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=186, last 2 years)
1875 Points +90%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
988 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (947 - 988, n=2)
968 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
947 Points -4%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
947 Points -4%Xiaomi Redmi 14CMediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
410 Points -59%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
405 Points -59% Multi-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=186, last 2 years)
5584 Points +167%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2302 Points +10%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
2093 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (1884 - 2093, n=2)
1989 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
1884 Points -10%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1341 Points -36%Xiaomi Redmi 14CMediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1011 Points -52%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (264891 - 3269237, n=89, last 2 years)
1536755 Points +243%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
469182 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
448064 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (428405 - 448064, n=2)
438235 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
428405 Points -4%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
264891 Points -41%PCMark for Android - Work 3.x
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=136, last 2 years)
15213 Points +30%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
12370 Points +6%Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (11683 - 12370, n=2)
12027 Points +3%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
11683 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
10629 Points -9%Xiaomi Redmi 14CMediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9393 Points -20%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8960 Points -23%BaseMark OS II
OverallAverage of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=112, last 2 years)
8099 Points +110%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
3859 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3678 Points -5%Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (3402 - 3859, n=2)
3631 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
3402 Points -12%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2168 Points -44% SystemAverage of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=112, last 2 years)
11654 Points +32%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
8845 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (8053 - 8845, n=2)
8449 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
8053 Points -9%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7104 Points -20%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4214 Points -52% MemoryAverage of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=112, last 2 years)
9458 Points +62%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
5851 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (3971 - 5851, n=2)
4911 Points -16%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4735 Points -19%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
3971 Points -32%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2976 Points -49% GraphicsAverage of class Smartphone (1046 - 61797, n=112, last 2 years)
25522 Points +761%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4058 Points +37%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
2987 Points +1%Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (2963 - 2987, n=2)
2975 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
2963 Points Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1651 Points -44% WebAverage of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=112, last 2 years)
1763 Points +22%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
1446 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (1403 - 1446, n=2)
1425 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
1403 Points -3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1341 Points -7%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1067 Points -26%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 78695, n=97, last 2 years)
20165 Points +288%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5946 Points +14%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
5194 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (5095 - 5194, n=2)
5145 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
5095 Points -2%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3769 Points -27%AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=73, last 2 years)
17721 Points +4795%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1019 Points +181%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
362 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (293 - 362, n=2)
328 Points -9%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
293 Points -19%Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=120, last 2 years)
660 Points +222%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
205 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (n=1)
205 Points 0% Half Precision NPU 1.7Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=120, last 2 years)
2585 Points +1131%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
210 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (n=1)
210 Points 0% Quantized NPU 1.7Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=120, last 2 years)
3864 Points +661%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
508 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (n=1)
508 Points 0%AI Benchmark
Score V5Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=23, last 2 years)
483 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
67.3 Points Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
46.4 Points Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (n=1)
46.4 Points Score V6Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=78, last 2 years)
5815 Points +10359%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
212 Points +281%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
177 Points +218%Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (55.6 - 177, n=2)
116.3 Points +109%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330, Mali-G68 MP2, 4096
55.6 Points
SoC 图形处理器的速度足以满足简单 3D 应用的需要，但更复杂的效果会对帧频造成很大影响。例如，在 GFXBench 中，只有简单的基准测试能以高于 30fps 的速度运行。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
351 Points Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
168 Points -52%Xiaomi Redmi 14CMali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
155 Points -56%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
364 Points Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
363 Points 0%Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
170 Points -53%Xiaomi Redmi 14CMali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
158 Points -57%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1354 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1348 Points Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
631 Points -53%Xiaomi Redmi 14CMali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
605 Points -55%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps +16%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +14%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
49 fps Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps -37%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps +22%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +2%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
59 fps Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps -42%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +38%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +12%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps -47%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps +55%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps -50%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +45%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +15%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -45%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +42%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -46%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +36%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +9%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6.7 fps -39%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +21%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps -44%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps +22%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps +13%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps Xiaomi Redmi 14CMali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps -7%Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
4.2 fps -49%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.7 fps +18%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +4%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.7 fps Xiaomi Redmi 14CMali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.8 fps -51%Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.8 fps -51%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +38%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +15%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps Xiaomi Redmi 14CMali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps -8%Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6.8 fps -48%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +25%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps Xiaomi Redmi 14CMali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps -52%Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -53%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.8 fps +17%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.6 fps +8%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.4 fps Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.3 fps -46%Xiaomi Redmi 14CMali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.2 fps -50%
虽然在Galaxy A17 5G 上浏览互联网有时会感觉有点慢，但其他入门级手机有时会慢很多。
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=116, last 2 years)
163.4 Points +67%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
111.073 Points +14%Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Chrome 131.0.6778.200)
99.846 Points +2%Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (97.7 - 99.8, n=2)
98.7 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
97.653 Points Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=76, last 2 years)
265 runs/min +132%Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
114 runs/min Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
107 runs/min -6%Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (87.6 - 114, n=2)
100.8 runs/min -12%Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Chrome 131.0.6778.200)
87.6 runs/min -23%Motorola Moto G15 (Chrome 134)
49.3 runs/min -57%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=86, last 2 years)
16.2 runs/min +129%Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
7.07 runs/min Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
6.79 runs/min -4%Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (4.98 - 7.07, n=2)
6.03 runs/min -15%Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Chrome 131.0.6778.200)
4.98 runs/min -30%Motorola Moto G15 (Chrome 134)
3.06 runs/min -57%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=94, last 2 years)
145.3 Points +42%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
112 Points +10%Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Chrome 131.0.6778.200)
109 Points +7%Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (102 - 109, n=2)
105.5 Points +3%Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
102 Points Motorola Moto G15 (Chrome 134)
56 Points -45%Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=141, last 2 years)
52606 Points +75%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
36371 Points +21%Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Chrome 131.0.6778.200)
33085 Points +10%Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (30119 - 33085, n=2)
31602 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
30119 Points Motorola Moto G15 (Chrome 134)
14692 Points -51%Xiaomi Redmi 14C (Chrome 131)
14565 Points -52%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G15 (Chrome 134)
2718 ms * -158%Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Chrome 131.0.6778.200)
1184.2 ms * -12%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
1130.9 ms * -7%Average Samsung Exynos 1330 (1055 - 1184, n=2)
1120 ms * -6%Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=120, last 2 years)
1057 ms * -0%Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Chrome 140)
1055 ms * * ... smaller is better
UFS 2.2 存储确保了合理的加载时间，也在一定程度上加快了数据传输的速度。
不过，必须指出的是，前代产品的存储控制器做得更好。
Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Galaxy A16 5GMotorola Moto G15Xiaomi Redmi 14CXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-531%-2%-6%218%-15%504% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)528.2529.46 0%287.7 -46%300.9 -43%950.62 80%300 ?(106.7 - 1190, n=88) -43%2232 ?(270 - 4370, n=174, last 2 years) 323% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)170.7273.75 60%228.5 34%193.1 13%792.56 364%196.6 ?(72.3 - 331, n=88) 15%1923 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=174, last 2 years) 1027% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)134.7206.73 53%65.2 -52%88.6 -34%257.91 91%85.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=88) -36%311 ?(47.6 - 614, n=174, last 2 years) 131% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)56.462.47 11%87.4 55%78.9 40%245.16 335%58.5 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=88) 4%358 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=174, last 2 years) 535%
游戏 - 小规模游戏三星Galaxy A17 5G 无法满足任何喜欢高要求游戏的用户的需求。
虽然性能足以满足图形简单的休闲游戏，但我们的测试游戏《玄心冲击》和《PUBG Mobile》只能达到 30-40fps 左右，即使如此，也会出现掉帧和卡顿现象。
我们使用GameBench软件进行测量。
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.7.0_33477673_33723678: Ø40.2 (15-46) fpsSamsung Galaxy A17 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.7.0_33477673_33723678: Ø24.7 (20-31) fpsSamsung Galaxy A17 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.9.0: Ø28.9 (12-31) fpsSamsung Galaxy A17 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.9.0: Ø29.5 (25-32) fps
排放 - 保持凉爽，几乎不节流温度机箱表面产生的热量不成问题，即使在负载情况下，温度也能达到 43.8°C。
3DMark 压力测试表明，系统在长时间负载运行时不需要节流，就能将内部温度控制在可接受的水平。
Max. LoadIdle
42.9 °C38 °C34 °C 43.8 °C38.4 °C34 °C 42.3 °C41.9 °C34.7 °C
Maximum: 43.8 °CAverage: 38.9 °C
32.4 °C36.6 °C43 °C33.4 °C35.4 °C42.4 °C33.5 °C37.5 °C44.7 °C
Maximum: 44.7 °CAverage: 37.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 43.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
23.1 °C23.2 °C23.1 °C 23.4 °C23.2 °C23.2 °C 23.4 °C23.3 °C23.1 °C
Maximum: 23.4 °CAverage: 23.2 °C
23.5 °C23.4 °C23.5 °C23.8 °C23.6 °C25.1 °C23.1 °C24.6 °C24.8 °C
Maximum: 25.1 °CAverage: 23.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 37.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 % 0%Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.1 % 0%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99 % Xiaomi Redmi 14CMali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 % -1% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestSamsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % +3%Motorola Moto G15Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.7 % +3%Xiaomi Redmi 14CMali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.3 % +1%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash
96.1 % Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy A16 5GMali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
%
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø2.18 (2.12-2.2) %Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.19 (2.18-2.2) %Motorola Moto G15 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.021 (1.01-1.024) %Xiaomi Redmi 14C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.94 (0.923-0.949) %Samsung Galaxy A17 5G Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.32 (8.27-8.35) %Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.31 (8.27-8.33) %Motorola Moto G15 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.8 (3.77-3.81) %Xiaomi Redmi 14C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.65 (3.6-3.67) %Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Mali-G68 MP2, Exynos 1330, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.1 (8.06-8.14) %
发言人您只能使用底部边缘的一个扬声器。虽然它的音量很大，但听起来总是有点高音偏重。
不过，音质还是可以接受的，尤其是对于这样一款廉价智能手机来说。即使在最大音量时，扬声器也不会出现卡壳现象。
外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接。可用于无线传输的编解码器包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和三星无缝编解码器 (SSC)，但其他智能手机可提供更多选择。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Samsung Galaxy A17 5G audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 42% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 26% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 可以做得更好 耗电量在我们的功耗测试中，Galaxy A17 5G 与前代产品相比显示出明显不同的能耗偏好：最低功耗仍然相当接近，但在空闲模式下，当前机型与 A16 5G 相比明显更加经济。 Galaxy A16 5G.
不过，在负载模式下，要想提供良好的性能，所需的功耗要稍高一些。
看来，三星在此方面进行了改进，以便在轻负载下优化功耗的同时，让 SoC 的性能更高一些。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.1 / 0.2 WattIdle 1 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Load
4.9 / 8.1 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G5000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A16 5G5000 mAhMotorola Moto G155200 mAhXiaomi Redmi 14C5160 mAhXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G5110 mAhAverage Samsung Exynos 1330 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-14%8%-1%-7%-16%Idle Minimum * (Watt)11.19 -19%0.6 40%1.15 -15%1.095 ?(1 - 1.19, n=2) -10%0.879 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=134, last 2 years) 12%Idle Average * (Watt)1.32.14 -65%1.3 -0%1.55 -19%1.72 ?(1.3 - 2.14, n=2) -32%1.474 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=134, last 2 years) -13%Idle Maximum * (Watt)1.62.17 -36%1.6 -0%1.57 2%1.885 ?(1.6 - 2.17, n=2) -18%1.663 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=134, last 2 years) -4%Load Average * (Watt)4.93.11 37%4.7 4%3.87 21%4.01 ?(3.11 - 4.9, n=2) 18%6.75 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=94, last 2 years) -38%Load Maximum * (Watt)8.17.15 12%8.5 -5%7.66 5%7.63 ?(7.15 - 8.1, n=2) 6%11.2 ?(4.75 - 22, n=94, last 2 years) -38%* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.48 (1.33-8.1) WattSamsung Galaxy A17 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.147 (1.028-1.496) Watt
功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.78 (2.51-4.79) WattSamsung Galaxy A17 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.147 (1.028-1.496) Watt
电池寿命总体而言，三星Galaxy A17 5G 的 5,000 毫安时电池续航能力也比较一般。13 小时 14 分钟的 Wi-Fi 上网时间比上一代产品要长，但同时与其他入门级智能手机相比也相对较短。
在游戏等负载情况下，电池续航时间为 4 小时 30 分钟。
电池充电功率可达 25 瓦。这意味着一个完整的充电周期大约需要 1 小时 30 分钟。
我们的评测设备没有配备充电器，但Galaxy A17 5G 电池可以用我们测试的所有充电器轻松充满。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 42min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 54min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 30min
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G5000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A16 5G5000 mAhMotorola Moto G155200 mAhXiaomi Redmi 14C5160 mAhXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G5110 mAhBattery runtime-1%13%23%4%Reader / Idle (h)33.734.5 2%29.8 -12%30 -11%H.264 (h)17.918.7 4%19.8 11%17 -5%WiFi v1.3 (h)13.212.4 -6%17 29%16.3 23%12.9 -2%Load (h)4.54.4 -2%5.5 22%6 33%
Notebookcheck 总体评分从纸面上看，三星Galaxy A17 5G 拥有六年更新的巨大承诺，但遗憾的是，制造商的措辞在一定程度上限制了这一点。
不过，从本质上讲，这款手机是一款具有不错功能的高品质入门级手机。
三星Galaxy A17 5G 评测。
Back to the verdict
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- 09/25/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Chassis84%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device88%
Connectivity43 / 69 → 62%
Weight89%
Battery89%
Display87%
Games Performance5 / 55 → 9%
Application Performance60 / 85 → 71%
AI Performance14%
Temperature89%
Noise100%
Audio71 / 90 → 78%
Camera60%
Average67%
73%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials35%Packaging100%Power Use95.8%Repairability60%Software Updates100% Total Sustainability Score: 65.1%
可能的替代品比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.73.3%Samsung Galaxy A17 5GSamsung Exynos 1330 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP2 ⎘4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMCAmazon: List Price: 209€192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.70"2340x1080385 PPIAMOLED
2.73.1%Samsung Galaxy A16 5GSamsung Exynos 1330 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP2 ⎘4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.2Amazon: List Price: 200€200 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"2340x1080385 PPISuper AMOLED
3.72.3%Motorola Moto G15Mediatek Helio G81 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMCAmazon: List Price: 150€190 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.72"2400x1080392 PPIIPS
4.70.7%Xiaomi Redmi 14CMediatek Helio G81 Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMCAmazon: List Price: 150€211 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.88"1640x720260 PPIIPS
5.75.4%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2Amazon: 190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080395 PPIAMOLED
More articles related to this deviceSamsung Galaxy A17 5G (Galaxy A10 Series)News•三星发起进攻：价格实惠的Galaxy A 机型再次给人留下深刻印象 |News•不到 200 美元的灵活摄像系统：这款三星智能手机赢得我们青睐的原因 |Review•三星Galaxy A17 4G 智能手机测试--配置出众的经济型手机 |News•三星的长期更新承诺：营销与现实的分离 |News•泄露：三星Galaxy A17 4G 即将上市，售价相当于 175 美元，提供 6 年更新和 AMOLED 显示屏 |Review•三星Galaxy A16 4G 评测 - 低于 180 欧元的 OLED 显示屏智能手机 |Review•三星Galaxy A16 5G 智能手机评测--特别便宜的Galaxy ，6 年更新一次 |News•三星Galaxy A15 LTE - 适合预算不多、要求简单的用户使用 |Review•三星Galaxy A15 4G 智能手机评测--价格低廉，功能强大，适合日常使用 |Review•三星Galaxy A15 5G 智能手机评测--经济型手机的重要更新 |Review•三星Galaxy A14 LTE 智能手机评测--这是升级吗？ |Review•三星Galaxy A14 5G评测--低价位的入门级智能手机的升级版 |News•Galaxy A54, A34, A14 5G欧洲定价泄露，揭示了三星平价手机的价格跳水。Galaxy Galaxy
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 180 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 819461 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: